Archive
SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2026 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2025 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2024 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2023 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2022 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2021 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2020 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2019 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2018 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2017 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2016 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2015 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2014 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2013 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2012 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2011 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2010 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2009 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2008 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2007

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/118/64-68

Asaf Huseynov

Police Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan

UOT CODE: 343.13

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9525-1447

huseynovasef504@gmail.com

 

On the improvement of Article 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code

 

Abstract

 

As is known, Article 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan is entitled “Objectivity, Impartiality and Fairness of Criminal Proceedings.” According to Article 7.0.8 of this normative legal act, criminal proceedings include pre-trial proceedings as well as proceedings conducted in the courts of first instance, appellate, and cassation instances, as prescribed by the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan. However, the provisions of Article 28 refer exclusively to the terms “court” and “judge,” which creates a normative barrier to applying the principles of objectivity, impartiality and fairness to other participants in criminal proceedings — such as the prosecutor, investigator and inquiry officer. Therefore, I consider it appropriate to replace the terms “court” and “judge” in the relevant article with a broader term — participants in criminal proceedings (including the prosecutor, investigator and judge), in order to ensure a more comprehensive application of the principles of a fair trial.

Keywords: objectivity, impartiality, fairness, public claim

 


Views: 301