Archive
SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2026 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2025 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2024 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2023 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2022 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2021 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2020 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2019 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2018 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2017 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2016 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2015 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2014 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2013 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2012 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2011 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2010 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2009 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2008 SCIENTIFIC WORK - 2007

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/120/87-96

Elbay Ahlimanov

Adam Mickiewicz University

Master student

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8290-9424

ahlimanov2001@gmail.com

 

Balancing Deterrence and Partnership: The EU’s Security Dilemma

Between Russia and Turkey

 

Abstract

 

This article analyzes the comparative impact of Russia and Turkey on European Union security, focusing on their distinct strategies, tools, and the EU’s varied responses. Russia represents a direct, revisionist threat through military aggression, hybrid warfare and energy dependency, leading the EU to adopt sanctions, bolster NATO’s eastern flank, and support Ukraine. Turkey’s approach combines assertive regional policies in the Black Sea and Eastern Mediterranean with selective cooperation on migration, trade, and defense, resulting in a fragmented EU stance that balances engagement and limited punitive measures. The research addresses the question: In what ways do hybrid threats and migration pressures from Russia and Turkey challenge EU cohesion and strategic autonomy? The study finds that both actors exploit disinformation, weaponize migration and contest maritime zones, compelling the EU to adapt via initiatives such as the Strategic Compass, PESCO, and REPowerEU. While these reforms enhance resilience, internal divisions and NATO reliance constrain the Union’s capacity for independent action, underscoring the need for coherent, long-term strategies that integrate deterrence with selective partnership.

Keywords: hybrid threats, strategic autonomy, EU Security policy, Black Sea Security, migration as a policy tool


Views: 290