Arxiv
Elmi iş - 2024 Elmi iş - 2023 Elmi iş - 2022 Elmi iş - 2021 Elmi iş - 2020 Elmi iş - 2019 Elmi iş - 2018 Elmi iş - 2017 Elmi iş - 2016 Elmi iş - 2015 Elmi iş - 2014 Elmi iş - 2013 Elmi iş - 2012 Elmi iş - 2011 Elmi iş - 2010 Elmi iş - 2009 Elmi iş - 2008 Elmi iş - 2007
Gulu Mastan Narimanzada
Baku State University
heydarovagulu@hotmail.com

RELATIONS AMONG EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS REGARDING THE
WITHDRAWAL FROM EU

Key words: withdrawal, treaty, European Commission, European Parliament, European Court of Justice, European Council, notification, consent  
Açar sözlər: çıxış, müqavilə, Avropa Komissiyası, Avropa Parlamenti, Avropa Ədalət Məhkəməsi, Avropa Şurası, bildiriş, razılıq  
Ключевые слова: выход, договор, Европейская Комиссия, Европейский Парламент, Суд Европейского Союза, Европейский Совет, уведомление, согласие

Introduction
The Treaty on European Union (TEU) explicitly foresees that a Member State may leave the EU. The involvement of EU institutions, and the various procedural arrangements imported from the EU treaty-making procedure, confirm that the exit clause is firmly embedded in the EU legal order. As such, it is governed not only by the terms of Article 50 TEU, but also by the canons of EU constitutional law.

Analysis
European Commission. The role of the European Commission in the withdrawal procedure is not entirely clear in the Treaties. According to Article 218(3) TFEU, the European Commission would make recommendations to the Council to open negotiations with the withdrawing state. As a general rule, the Commision negotiates agreements with third countries on behalf of the EU, but Article 218(3) leaves it open for the Council to nominate a different Union negotiator [9, 33].




Baxış: 658